Thursday, January 3, 2008

"Relational Neighborhoods"

Excerpt from Frank A. Mills, Urban Psychologist

A "relational neighborhood" is a "group of people with which an individual interacts frequently, to whom an individual feels connected, or to whom the individual would go to for help." Relational "neighbors" may include family members, schoolmates, friends, co-workers, and church members, as well as neighbors.

Although "relational neighborhood," by definition, can define "neighborhoods" other than geographical neighborhoods it would serve us well to understand the characteristics of a relational neighborhood as they apply to the geographical neighborhood.

Andrew Crook in his essay on the Relational City ("The Relational City: A New Framework for Tackling Unemployment," Relationship Institute, Cambridge, England, 1997) suggests that there are three characteristics, and five "micro-building blocks" for the Relational City. Applying these to the context of a geographical neighborhood, we find that a relational neighborhood is a neighborhood where residents share a commitment to the neighborhood, to each other, and to joint participation in improving their neighborhood.

To delineate, Crook's three characteristics are ...
  • A commitment to place: A relational neighborhood is one to which residents are committed to, and feel pride in belonging to.

  • A commitment to people: A relational neighborhood in one characterized by mutual respect and concern among residents.

  • A commitment to participation: A relational neighborhood is one which residents know their joint power for change and use it.

For Crook, the five elements, or "micro-level building blocks," necessary to create a Relational City, or for our purposes, a relational neighborhood out of which beneficial characteristics like mutual trust and co-operation can develop are:

  • Face-to-face contact (Directness)
    Residents physically meet with each other and mutually interact. In the process, they begin to understand and appreciate other perspectives expressed by neighbors. Simply put, relationships cannot exist if people do not come together.

  • Common purpose (Commonality)
    Residents share a joint vision, or at least some elements. If residents do not share a common purpose there will be no opportunity to profitably work together. Common purpose requires residents to be convinced that there are common projects on which they can co-operate to their mutual advantage.

  • Contact over time (Continuity)
    Relationships take time to develop. People are highly unlikely to form strong commitment to a neighborhood if they see their stay likely to be short.

  • Contact in different contexts (Multiplexity)
    Multiplexity is the idea that a relationship between two (or more) people is strengthened if it takes place in more than one context. In my neighborhood, for example, most of my neighbors attend the same church and we all walk to the same stores.

  • Mutual respect (Parity)
    Neighborhood residents are able to interact on roughly the same level with equal power. Neighbors meet on equal footing and contribute equally. When a particular neighbor chooses at times to remain aloof from the neighborhood a relational neighborhood will accept the neighbor back into the process as if he had never left.

No comments: