Showing posts with label mixed use. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mixed use. Show all posts

Friday, December 28, 2007

Excape The Bland...Designing Micro Centers

excerpt from Retail Trends

Main Street USA

For horizontal mixed-use projects, architects say the most frequent failing is creating a development that feels bland to the customer. Mixed-use projects are expected to recreate the town square setting found in downtowns of the past, but many architects don't look closely enough at what made those settings work, according to John R. Clifford, principal of GreenbergFarrow, a national firm offering architecture, engineering and development services.

“They are trying to recreate the Main Street of Disneyland, this artificial idea of what a Main Street looks like,” says Jack Illes, managing partner of Urban Labs, a Del Mar, Calif.-based urban design and architecture firm specializing in mixed-use retail and residential projects. “You can show up anywhere in the country and you'll find the same kind of place, with the same tenants and after a while, it's going to feel as tired as the mall because it's not unique.”

This is a costly mistake, because horizontal mixed-use projects, where buildings are spread out over many small buildings, bring some added expenses to the mix. Four-sided construction tends to cost 10 percent to 15 percent more than the three-sided approach commonly used with single-use retail properties, says Jack O'Brien, president of Dallas, Texas-based architecture firm O'Brien & Associates.

To break monotony, allowing retailers to pursue their own design visions can help make the place unique, according to Illes. He brings up the example of General Growth Properties' Otay Ranch Town Center, a recently opened lifestyle property in Chula Vista, Calif.
General Growth let each retailer design its own storefront, resulting in details as varied as limestone pillars and striped awnings to stonework and a sunset yellow color scheme for the local Barnes & Noble.

The quality of the materials, however, has to be consistent throughout the development, says Stan Laegreid, principal of Seattle, Wash-based Callison Architecture. A community for the mid-market consumer should not have elements of luxury to avoid confusing customers.

A common mistake architects have made with some of the first horizontal mixed-use projects has been to bury the retail deep inside the project's residential components. The retail and residential should play off each other, but retail also needs to pull from a wider trade area, says Greg Lyon, partner with KTGY Group, Inc., an Irvine, Calif.-based planning and architecture firm. “They need traffic that extends beyond that community,” he says.

When adding entertainment to the mix, designers also need to think about the hours of operation for theaters and restaurants. “A live theater isn't necessarily used 365 days a year and even if it is, it's typically only from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m.,” says Illes. “What happens the rest of the day? You've got a bunch of doors leading to an empty, dark place and that can kill traffic.” And location is important as well. Otherwise, residents may have to deal with noise every night.

To make the projects interesting to explore, architects and planners should vary the width and length of streets within the development, the style and height of various buildings, the size of public area spaces and the distribution of architectural features such as fountains and clock towers.

“Real cities were built over time by different architects and different landlords,” says Clifford. “They have modern structures on the side of Neoclassical ones, with Victorian architecture nearby.”

Spacing is also an important consideration, says Alex Espinoza, design principal in the retail/commercial studio of Dorsky Hodgson Parrish Yue, a Cleveland, Ohio-based architecture firm. When buildings are too close together, people feel uneasy, but putting them too far apart disorients visitors, Espinoza says.

The configuration and placement of parking lots is one of the greatest challenges in mixed-use development. Most experts say that parking in horizontal projects should be segregated by use, with separate lots set aside for residents, retail customers and office workers. These lots have to be connected to their respective uses by convenient pedestrian links and should be within close walking distance for the center's customers, says Michael Alston, of Development Design Group, a Baltimore, Md.-based planning, architecture and design firm. In vertical projects, which tend to use structured parking, segregation is even more critical — the condominium owners don't want to come home a week before Christmas and find that their spaces have been taken by shoppers, says Lyon. He recommends creating separate entrances for residents and office workers from the retail portion of the project.

Vertically challenged

In vertical mixed-use projects national retail tenants with good credit are vital for securing financing, but they have set store prototypes and prefer wide, open spaces with great ceiling height. That is difficult to achieve when there are all kinds of mechanical and plumbing systems coming down from the apartments above, says Simon Sykes, vice president with Development Design Group. One solution is to position these systems horizontally, along the ceiling, instead of vertically, when they come to the first floor. O'Brien recommends creating a 2- to 4-foot tall interstitial space between the retail level and the apartments above for sewer pipes as a way to avoid multiple penetrations of the podium slab above retail.

In vertical mixed-use, structured parking can account for up to 15 percent of the entire project cost, while not producing any revenue, says Laegreid.

Another issue to tackle is how the retailers can load and unload merchandise without disturbing residents. A loading dock can be installed in the back of the building or on the ground floor or basement level, with an elevator delivering the goods to the retailer's main floor. This requires a delicate balancing act — elevators and servicing areas often translate into inefficient space and lost revenue, resulting in up to 15 percent of additional expense, says Laegreid.

Getting the message out

The architect also has to make sure that the retail component is the most eye-catching of all in a mixed-use property, says Jeff Green, owner of Jeff Green Partners, a Mill Valley, Calif.-based retail consulting firm. In such a dense environment, visitors' eyes tend to wander and if the storefronts don't jump out at them, the retailers are likely to suffer. O'Brien recommends using different construction materials to set retail apartfrom residential and office.

Considering what kind of tenants go well with a mixed-use building is also an important decision. Restaurants, for example, are a risk for vertical mixed-use projects because in addition to the smell and noise that might bother residents, they can draw rats and mice that could eventually scurry up and infest residential units.

“That's new information to many people in the suburban hinterland; it isn't necessarily self-evident,” says Illes. To prevent a disaster, developers need to make sure that the market in which their mixed-use property is going to be located can support each use on its own. They have to educate themselves on what makes mixed-use work and adequately explain their vision to the architect, says Illes.

“If you hire different architecture firms for each use, you've got one team trying to solve all of their problems and another team concentrating on what they need,” says Brian Church, of Urban Labs.

“We've tried that in some cases, but it's really difficult,” Church says.

Monday, April 9, 2007

UniverCity's Flex Units

From : Smart Bylaws Guide – Secondary Suites – Multi-Family Flex Units

New zoning for the mixed-use development called UniverCity in Burnaby at Simon Fraser University allows suites in strata townhouses or apartments. These “multi-family flex units” are minimum 74 square metre (796.5 square feet) dwellings containing a defined area for potential rental accommodation. The potential rental must be at least 24 square metres (258.3 square feet) and not more than 35 percent of the gross floor area of the dwelling.

The Flexsuite must:
  • Contain a secondary kitchen area with a compact range or microwave oven and built-in cook top, compact refrigerator, sink, counter, cabinets and venting
  • Have at least one closet and bathroom with a toilet, sink and bathtub or shower
  • Be wired for an independent telephone connection prior to occupancy
  • Have a separate lockable entrance door providing direct access to the exterior of the dwelling unit.

Not less than ten and not more than 50 percent of units in a multi-family dwelling shall be flex units, and the dwelling must provide a common washing machine and dryer for every 20, or part thereof, multi-family flex units. If the unit is available for rent it must be registered with the student housing registry at the University.

Burnaby Zoning Bylaw No. 4742 (Consolidated to May 12, 2003) – see Section 3 Definitions and Schedule VIII – Off-Street Parking

Thursday, April 5, 2007

Tokyo Green Space?

Exerpt from Multi-Housing News, By Diana Mosher

Midtown Tower, the tallest skyscraper in this city, is now open for business. The 53-story mixed-use building is the centerpiece of Tokyo Midtown, the most diverse mixed-use project to date, by Tokyo-based Mitsui Fudosan. Comprising more than one million square feet, Tokyo Midtown was designed around the concept "diversity on the green." In compliance with a local ordinance, 40 percent of the 25-acre site -- which was formerly occupied by Japan's Self-Defense Agency -- is now green space in the densely populated Roppongi neighborhood.

The 140 existing trees removed during construction have been replanted, according to specifications by landscape architect EDAW. The architectural team also includes: master architect SOM; retail designers Communication Arts Inc. and Kengo Kuma and Associates; multi-housing designers Jun Aoki & Associates; and Sakakura Associates Architects and Engineers.

According to Toshihide Ichikawa, managing officer and general manager of Mitsui Fudosan Co. Ltd.'s Tokyo Midtown Development Department, mixed use is a relatively new concept in Japan that has steadily gained acceptance over the past 10 years. The Tokyo Midtown complex is likely to advance this real estate model. In addition to three office buildings (Midtown Tower, the 24-story Midtown East, and the 13-story Midtown West), it also features 410 rental units at Tokyo Midtown Residences, 107 Oakwood Premier long-term stay/serviced residences, and the Ritz Carlton Hotel—and Park Residences at Ritz Carlton—on the top floors of the Midtown Tower.

The city within a city is also home to the city's largest medical center, a 24-hour food market, a museum designed by Tadao Ando, a convention hall, and an array of retail choices. Tokyo is known for its sophisticated and efficient rail transportation system, and Tokyo Midtown's transit-oriented design provides interesting lessons for urban planners, developers and architects.

The project is attracting international business, and all of its commercial space is fully leased, according to Toshihiko Omachi, project leader, planning and administration group, Mitsui Fudosan. Tenants include Cisco Systems Inc. and Yahoo Japan Corporation.

The design of the public areas was an important consideration in filling the space. "SOM was one of six companies we considered for master architect," added Ichikawa. "SOM proposed a very open and spacious concept with an emphasis on the plaza and square, and they incorporated the green areas into the overall design.

"The design of Midtown Tower was also critical. "If the building had been overpowering, it would have looked out of place," Ichikawa said. "This design is elegant and nicely integrated into the skyline. The sky is for everyone [to enjoy], not just for us."

According to Ichikawa, "When we procured the site, the local economy was in decline and was also feeling the effects of 9/11. We wanted to contribute to the rebuilding of Tokyo's reputation. Now, the entire world is doing better. Our exports are good. Japanese banks have completed writing off bad debt, and the Japanese economy right now is in good shape."

Mitsui Fudosan is project manager of Tokyo Midtown and a 40-percent investor with five other companies who are also business owners and have funded the project: National Mutual Insurance Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives, Meiji Yasuda Life Insurance Company, Sekisui House, Ltd., Fukoku Mutual Life Insurance Company, and Daido Life Insurance Company. Outside Japan, Mitsui Fudosan also has a presence in New York, Hawaii, Europe, Shanghai and Singapore.

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Considerations for Live-Work Space

by Zimmerman Volk

“Live-work” is a unit or building type that has been designed to accommodate non-residential
uses in addition to, or combined with living quarters. Live-work units are commonly
proposed in new traditional neighborhoods or new town centers, particularly as a transition
from residential to commercial areas or as a means of introducing small-scale retail.
The growing number of home-based businesses in the United States (reported in 1997 as four
million) is often cited as a justification for live-work. However, there is an important
distinction between a “home-based business” and a “business-based home.” Most home-based
businesses can be accommodated in almost any kind of dwelling unit. In contrast, the
business-based home is a true live-work unit: a dwelling unit with a configuration that is
influenced or even dictated by the non-residential activities.
Four live-work development considerations:

1. Flexibility
Live-work units should be flexible in order to respond to economic, social and technological
changes over time. The unit configuration must also be flexible in order to comply with the
requirements of the Fair Housing Amendments Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

2. Non-restrictive zoning
Compatible uses (retail, office, residential) should be permitted on blocks in and surrounding
the neighborhood center, regardless of unit configuration.

3. Tenure
Rental live-work units are absorbed faster than for-sale. The financial commitment of a lease
is small and of relatively short duration compared with a mortgage. A for-sale live-work unit
represents an opportunity for the small investor: a resident investor can lease the flex space for
residential, retail or office use; a non-resident investor can lease both the main residential space
and the flex space.

4. Timing
Live-work is not exempt from normal commercial real estate dynamics. In new
neighborhoods, live-work should be one of the later building types to be introduced, not the
first. It is easier to capture the full value and appeal of live-work units in locations where the
benefits of traditional neighborhoods are readily apparent.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Crime Prevention Through Design

By Diane Zahm

Our urban neighborhoods are suffering from years of suburban development, which has destroyed their physical, economic and social fabric, and left it torn and frayed. In some neighborhoods this process has created an urban wasteland of vacant lots, buildings, streets and sidewalks that have become havens for crime. It is these vacancies—or voids—that are now the most problematic. Abandoned buildings serve as residences for drug users and prostitutes. Vacant lots full of trash and weeds attract homeless persons or become the local hangout for gang members. Vacated or unused alleys function as a street network for drug dealers.

In many ways, land-use policies exacerbate the problem. Long ago, in an effort to promote economic development, downtown neighborhoods were rezoned for commercial or industrial uses, eliminating any opportunity for ongoing investment in residential or mixed-use development. Instead, property ownership became highly speculative. Nonresident investors accumulated parcels for profit, all the while renting to tenants who themselves lacked any emotional investment in the neighborhood. Real property tax revenues dried up; so did neighborhood support services. Grocery stores, pharmacies, department stores, banks, doctors and dentists—all moved to the suburbs. But this was not just a loss of residents or taxes or services; the process destroyed the dynamic mix of uses and activities that made urban neighborhoods vibrant and contributed to community safety and security.

Studies show that crime occurs most frequently in those places without observers or guardians; in other words, in the voids. Many years ago Jane Jacobs, in her book, The Death and Life of Great American Cities, offered observations regarding those elements that contribute to a safe and healthy urban neighborhood. Among them are a mix of uses, clearly defined public and private spaces, 24-hour activity, eyes on the street, adequate lighting, uniform setbacks, architectural variety and short blocks. Many planners and designers took Jacobs' insights as a wake-up call, but were undeterred by her disdain for the "doctrine of salvation by bricks." Their new plans called for mixed uses, uniform setbacks and other important physical elements without considering the extent to which residents, property owners, business managers, visitors and others must be engaged in order for a neighborhood to be truly safe. For what good is a mix of uses if the activity they generate never attracts people who care about the neighborhood around them, who pick up litter and scrub off graffiti and report drug dealing? Without them the neighborhood is also without the observers or guardians who are so critical to safety and security, a need that cannot be filled by police or private security.

Traditional neighborhood development represents an important step toward safer, more secure urban neighborhoods. It begins by mending the physical and economic fabric of the neighborhood, by filling the voids left by vacant lots, buildings and alleyways. Open spaces, then, are no longer merely voids, but carefully located and designed streets, walks, yards and parks that knit together the uses and activities that surround them. Traditional neighborhood development has the potential to re-establish the social network of the neighborhood as well. Of course, traditional neighborhood development cannot guarantee "community," but it can provide a dynamic and attractive mix of uses, with lot sizes, building scales and floor plans that reflect contemporary lifestyles. If traditional neighborhood development is successful, no space or place in the neighborhood will be without a guardian or owner, someone who participates in its management and upkeep—and who, therefore, helps to prevent crime.

Mixed-Use Neighborhoods Decrease Risk of Obesity

Confirming last year's study by University of Maryland's National Center for Smart Growth researcher Reid Ewing, who found higher obesity rates in counties with sprawling rather than compact development, a new Georgia Institute of Technology in-depth study of links between weight and the built environment in metro Atlanta, led by University of British Columbia Associate Professor Lawrence D. Frank, shows the relative risk of obesity increases 35 percent from the most to the least mixed-use areas.

Monday, March 19, 2007

Smart Codes For Smart Places

by Jason Miller

Mention zoning codes to the average person and the reaction is predictable: a stone-faced stare, glazed eyes, a yawn. But communities across the United States are discovering that the very fabric of their neighborhoods and towns is built on those codes—or, more accurately, because of them. And communities are doing something about these codes.

Conventional zoning codes are fundamentally flawed, says Geoffrey Ferrell, a principal with Geoffrey Ferrell Associates in Washington, D.C. “Ever since the industrial years, the conventional separation-of-uses approach has been the wrong approach to control”—to keeping unpleasant uses away from the residential areas. “It has devolved to micromanagement of use and density. The [built environment] that has resulted is very, very poor about 99 percent of the time. No one’s happy with what they’ve been given.”

Ferrell’s co-principal, Mary Madden, agrees. “That micromanagement of uses has resulted in a huge number of unintended consequences, namely, suburban sprawl. Everybody hates sprawl, but the builders aren’t violating rules; they’re building exactly what the codes call for. Those codes are a blueprint for sprawl. Under the existing conventional codes, you can’t help but build it.”

Community frustration with conventional codes and the type of development they spawn has driven new urbanist- and smart growth–minded planners to create new zoning codes. While these new codes go by many names— form-based codes, new urbanist codes, TND (traditional neighborhood development) ordinances, smart zoning, the SmartCode© from Miami-based town planners Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company—they are all designed to create places that emulate the urbanism of older, well-loved places, while preserving rural areas and historic sites threatened by conventional development.

Communities that have replaced their conventional codes with new ordinances have generally reported success in the process leading up to the new codes’ implementation, as well as favorable upturns in their real estate markets.

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Live Theater & Shopping

excerpt from Shopping Centers Today

Federal Realty Investment Trust’s Village at Shirlington, in Arlington, Va., gained a dramatic anchor last month — literally. The locally based Signature Theatre production company moved from its space in an industrial garage to a 48,000-square-foot playhouse at the center. The Village is an outdoor, Main Street-style shopping center last renovated in 1989 and made up largely of restaurants and cafés. Tenants include Capital City Brewing Company, Caribou Coffee and Johnny Rockets. Shoppers can have dinner and then see a show, and Sam Sweet, managing director of Signature, says this has worked out very well. “We’ve promoted it as a total entertainment experience,” he said. “Instead of having to find parking and run across the street, people can park in the free garage, walk into Shirlington, perhaps have dinner and see a show.”


The playhouse is in a four-floor complex, with the first floor occupied by the Arlington County Library. The mostly musical repertoire includes Stephen Sondheim’s Into the Woods, which has been a big success, according to Sweet. Walls of glass in the lobby allow patrons to sit at the bar and look out onto the shopping crowd. With the mixture of retail and theater entertainment, Sweet says, traffic has increased, with more visitors walking in for ticket purchases.

Monday, March 12, 2007

Mixed-Use Hotel & Culture

The prescription for reviving downtown American cities, everyone seems to agree these days, is culture. And so as developers rely increasingly on creating mixed-use districts, it’s perhaps not surprising that some are developing mixed-use buildings. The 21C hotel in downtown Louisville, KY is the latest attempt at a sized-down cultural destination.

The 21C, designed by Deborah Berke Architects for philanthropists Steve Wilson and Laura Lee Brown, is a hotel-museum-restaurant amalgam in a renovated 5-building former warehouse complex. The art hotel—or museum with beds—is a single, dense cultural site devoted to both leisure and function.

What separates this building from other leisure ventures is the conscious integration of culture into all of its physical spaces. The hotel displays contemporary art pieces within guest rooms and hallways, as well as in stand-alone gallery spaces. Guests (paying guests, that is) don’t have to wander far from their living space to experience a cultural attraction; they see it before they’ve brushed their teeth. Wilson and Brown hired Deborah Berke Architects, known for their deft use of minimalist design, to accentuate the experience of viewing contemporary art. Berke faced the challenge of renovating the old warehouses while retaining part of their historic character. The façade of the original building remains, but the architects removed a large chunk of the middle to create an atrium accessible to interior hotel rooms. The union of the old and the new structures is a subtle reminder that boundaries of urban space—whether physical or experiential— are open to negotiation. Berke was positive about the synthesis of functions in 21C, and its ability to appeal to visitors. “[The] vision,” she recalls, “was that there be culture, there be food, there be destination.” The 21C encompasses all these activities, and suggests that the project of keeping disparate downtown experiences discreet may be expendable. Indeed, cities keen to create attractive cultural districts will no doubt continue to experiment with this hyper-mixed-use model.